My coworkers laughed at this. "It's a drop in the bucket," they said. Looking at it from a Tokyo associate's point of view, this is particularly true. In addition to our big law base salary, we receive a $75 per day cost of living adjustment and a free place to live. It's a generous compensation package and leaves us with enough money to pay down debt, save, and spend somewhat freely. This is why my coworkers were shaking their heads at me.
Why are our perspectives on money so different? First, my time on the generous expat compensation package is quickly coming to an end. Second, I've seen too many other associates spend their money mindlessly and then deeply regret it when they are laid off or move to a much lower paying job to preserve their marriage or their sanity while still burdened with a substantial student loan balance. I do not want to find myself in those circumstances.
When I started out as an associate, I decided I would try to live on an amount of money that equaled my pre-law school after-tax income and use the difference between my pre- and post-law school after-tax incomes to pay down debt or save. I have stuck to that plan for almost three years and am just starting to really appreciate the results.
Has it involved a lot of sacrifice? It hasn't felt like it. That's not to say that I haven't felt jealous of my brother who makes roughly the same income and has bought a big house, sporty luxury car, spendy engagement ring, European vacation and numerous weekend getaways over the same period of time. (It's the house and European vacation that I covet!)
Nonetheless, as I'm coming up on my 33rd birthday, I'm tiring of the discipline. (Here I'd like to acknowledge that a frugal person would have curtailed spending more than I have.) This is mainly manifesting itself in my apartment search. It looks like a one-bedroom apartment in a safe location near my office is going to cost me $2,000/month including pet rent and parking. I am incredibly frustrated by the idea of spending so much to live in 600-700 sq. ft. in a neighborhood I don't love. As of today, I'm considering a 550 sq. ft. studio for $1,800/month including pet rent and parking to save some money.
I'd really like to buy a place of my own and build some equity, but even after being careful with my money in recent years it still feels like this is out of reach. First, because most people say you shouldn't buy unless you plan to stay in the same place for at least five years and I hope to get out of LA sooner than that. This obstacle could be overcome by buying a place that can become a rental when I'm ready to move on. Second, as Ben harshly pointed out, I "have no job security." This could be said of many people. If I could find a small enough place that the mortgage payment equaled monthly apartment rent (and that's a big if in my future neighborhood assuming you want a place in good repair) and stuck to the idea of selecting a place that can become a rental unit, is this point really a deal breaker?
While playing it safe hasn't felt like a bummer before, it does now. Years ago, when I decided to go to law school, one of the major motivating factors was the idea that it would put home ownership within reach. (I had recently seen some small Charleston-style townhouses that I adored, but would never be able to buy on my paralegal salary.) It's a disappointment that I still don't seem to be ready to have my own place. At least this is something that I can work towards. With each passing year, home ownership should become more plausible.
What do you think? Am I being too conservative? Doing a terrible job of finding a good deal on an apartment?
What do you think? Am I being too conservative? Doing a terrible job of finding a good deal on an apartment?